Piracy, the smelly fish in the internet market
The topic of Internet Piracy tends to bring up many harsh words and criticism, often leading to separation of friends, ending of marriages, and spit ridden coffee. Even more drastic is the prosecution, imprisonment, and tarnishing of ones record. While the statistics are bright as day with proof behind the illegality of piracy, I believe there are ways that both parties, corporate and personal users can be satisfied.
The argument
Supporters of Software Piracy argue that it enhances a companies outreach, allowing more users to participate in their products, effectively introducing more users to the product. In turn, most folks will proceed with a purchase. HBO said recently that online piracy of their popular production Game of Thrones was "a compliment that doesn't hurt sales". More impressively, a recent study by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre found that piracy does not negatively affect music sales, rather it promotes and online purchase of the content. Lastly, a study by TweakGuides reveals that users who enjoy a title that features a "free-to-play" or reduced cost play model will be more likely to purchase downloadable content or upgrade accounts to a higher, more expensive tier level.
But does it matter?
It is my own personal opinion that companies need to understand that folks often like things for free. Moreover, they enjoy trying things before they dig deep into their wallets and make a purchase. Companies should always offer users something for free, and know just where to stop their trial to keep customers wanting more. If prospective patrons can get a taste for an application, they're sure to make a purchase. If I can play a game to a certain level to be left with a cliffhanger, I'm sure to buy the whole game. If I absolutely love a bands demo, I'm more than likely going to buy the whole album.
Short and sweet, give customers enough proof that the product they're interested in is worth the cash. Otherwise, you just appear as a greedy corporation or band that wants to get rich.
Resources
http://bgr.com/2013/04/01/hbo-online-piracy-analysis-408449/ HBO Quote
http://www.ibtimes.com/online-piracy-does-not-negatively-affect-digital-music-sales-may-actually-help-music-industry ECJR Quote
http://www.tweakguides.com/Piracy_1.html Game Piracy
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Monday, April 29, 2013
If the working world has changed so much, why not education yet?!
With new technology comes new ways of doing things. And with new ways of doing things comes new kinds of jobs. But if the whole United States has changed so much in this sense even within the past 50 years, then how come the educational system is almost exactly the same? Math, history, science, and the language arts are still good to know the basics of, and large amounts of knowledge of them is required for some jobs still, but many new occupations require much more than that.
This modern world is made up of business, technology, and extensive healthcare, so I propose the college degree requirements to be shrunk to include mostly just that, and for those subjects to be encouraged to be studied a lot more. Not only that, but the elementary-high school educational system should be shrunk, plus have those subjects be taught part time to those that young by experts in those fields. If we want a better economy and workforce, then we have to implicate a better educational system.
This modern world is made up of business, technology, and extensive healthcare, so I propose the college degree requirements to be shrunk to include mostly just that, and for those subjects to be encouraged to be studied a lot more. Not only that, but the elementary-high school educational system should be shrunk, plus have those subjects be taught part time to those that young by experts in those fields. If we want a better economy and workforce, then we have to implicate a better educational system.
Contaminated Fish Are Everywhere!
So I’m sure I’m not
the only one who spends time at a family cabin. Despite being a
mostly-vegetarian, I occasionally partake in a fish-fry with my family of fish
caught off our lake.
It’s a beautiful lake, no big industry or farms, just
smallish cabins all around. So I assumed the fish was perfectly healthy.
I long ago gave up most meat due to how increasingly
unhealthy it is due to factory farming (the moral reasons are more secondary
for me). So, I occasionally eat meat when I know that it’s humanely raised and
free of ridiculous antibiotics and whatnot. For instance, last year I was in Ireland where cows are raised like this and you better believe I ate a full irish breakfast.
Anyway, I know that fish is supposed to be very healthy with
lots of essential fatty acids. So, I figured eating some nice “wild” fish off
the lake every couple months is probably good for my health. So I was very
surprised when I was writing an article at work the other day and my research
suggested that pregnant women limit their intake of fish.
Now I knew that pregnant women should avoid some types of
fish higher up on the food chain and probably anything factory farmed. But, on a whim I searched and found this site from the Minnesota Department of Health that says that women who are or may become pregnant shouldn't have walleye caught in Minnesota more than once a month.
Ok, this was crazy because I was sure Minnesota had some pretty clean lakes. But surely they didn't mean my lake. I mean I know we boat and ski on it but come on that's just on the surface. They probably meant lakes down in the metro area which I could totally understand.
Nope! Right here I scrolled down and found my poor lake info telling me that those crappie and sunfish I love to have at family fish-frys are contaminated with mercury.
So I guess my point is that there really is no safe place to get clean food any more. It's a sad day when even the fish you catch on lakes a hundred miles from any major city are contaminated with mercury. Don't be a fool like me and think that this sort of contamination is only near major cities and areas of the country with terrible regulation and evil corporations.
The not so distant future
Recently 3d printing hit the news with people printing high capacity ammo clips. I see 3d printing having a much larger reach than just to weirdos in Texas. The ammo clip is a great example of how our world is changing.
3d printing is like a glue gun on steroids. A plastic filament is melted and the printer lays the melted plastic down according to the computer blueprint. 3d printing can do pretty much any kind of manufacturing with plastic and some companies are working on ceramic printing.
The 3d printers are currently used for fast prototyping and small scale manufacturing. They cost anywhere from a few hundred dollars for DIY kits to tens of thousands for multi-axis printers. Most people have only heard of 3d printers and they aren't part of our daily dialog except when it is a news worthy item. I believe they will be part of our daily lives and in a big way.
Look around you and note how much of what you see is plastic. 3d printers allow you to make all of it, everything that is plastic around you. You just need the blueprint. I envision a world where we won't buy many products we currently purchase. We will buy the computer blueprint, download it and then we print the product out on our home 3d printers. And when that product breaks or it goes out of fashion, we melt it down and print out the latest greatest version.
Sound far fetched? It's already being done, the ammo clips were made on a $1500.00 3d printer and the blueprint is online for anyone to download. I don't think it'll be long of companies to grab hold of this technology and create a new business model.
I think it'll be really cool to customize everything. And not just superficially, but the entire object. Is you water bottle to big/small for you hand? Tweak the design and print a new one. Is your alarm clock taking up to much space on the nightstand? You know what to do…..
Pets and adoption
Every year 4-5 million dogs and cats are euthanized by
shelters, mostly due to lack of space and the animals not being adopted. That breaks down to 61 percent of all dogs
entering shelters and 75 percent of cats entering shelter according to the Humane Society.
As an owner of 2 cats this really hurts to see such high
numbers of mostly loving animals being put to “sleep” due to people no longer
wanting them along with the lack of people getting their cat or dog spayed or
neutered.
The bottom line is if you don’t want more kittens or puppies
then you need to spay or neuter them if not, I hope you can find them loving
homes. But a lot of people who do take
on the challenge of raising a kitten of puppy will fall in love with the
cuteness of that stage and as time goes on and they grow up they suddenly are
too big of a problem, people don’t have space, apartments don’t allow them, etc.,
etc. They then are turned into the
Humane Society where older animals have a very slim chance of being adopted and
then end up being euthanized.
Before you get a puppy or kitten please remember that they
will be with you for quite a while, so please be willing to commit that much
time to having them and they will add a lot of joy to your life.
Analytical review
This article from courant.com
makes an assumption that a parking lot accident will result in an extortion of
money or a “shootout” if guns were involved.
This is purely just that an assumption and why if this encounter was
going to turn out so violently as the author assumes it would, did the drivers
of the other car not chase him down with his “deadly” car and run him off the
road? Because after all cars kill more
people than guns do.
What if the angry man had a knife would he then pull it and
stabbed in anger? If so we should ban
all knives, which is the same type of argument.
He claims that people with guns kill, but if we take away guns are we
not going to just find another way to kill if that is our intention? Boston showed the use of pressure cookers,
9-11 showed airplane use, the school stabbing in Los Angeles showed that a
knife can be used as well.
This article is completely biased and assumes too much and
uses “what if” statements to build an image, made up in his own head, of what
would have happened if the angry driver had a gun.
Infrastructure
All of us in Minnesota remember the collapse of the I-35
bridge collapse but are we alone in the nation, in this tragedy, or is it a
bigger problem?
According to the American Society of Civil Engineers 2013 report card, they give
America’s total infrastructure a rating of a D+. Really? A D+ as a college student I would be
truly disappointed if I were to receive this grade and I would truly try anything
to get that score up.
So, how about the state of just the other bridges in
America? According to suite101.com
the bridges in America get a slightly better grade of C, with 26 percent of the
bridges in America being considered structurally deficient or functionally
obsolete.
So this begs us to ask why in a nation as powerful as ours our
infrastructure is so horrible and nothing in being done about it? Why are we not spending more money to fix
this problem? Why are we giving money to other nations when our own is in such
need of repair? I would think that I-35
would act as a wake-up call but almost 6 years after the collapse and we are
still getting such poor grades.
Suicide Prevention
In
the blog above, the memory of a young woman is reflected upon and
remembered. The journey of friendship these two individuals had
from the time they were young and having slumber parties until college
approached them. College didn’t separate the two or put a strain on their
relationship because of the ongoing letters they wrote. They did this same
thing when they were younger and temporarily separated in a family move.
Signs were never brought to the forefront of this horrific event that would
lead to a young woman taking her life. This
is an excellent blog and I admire the openness of the writer because I can’t
begin to imagine how difficult it would be to talk about an issue such as this
on such a public forum. I understand
that this is a blog about reflection and less on the facts of suicide, but I think
to add facts about the issue would have been a great addition to the blog. Suicide is something that has impacted my
life and is something that I stay aware about within all the friends and family
I surround myself. It is difficult to
know the specifics per person, but to just be aware of the surroundings is the
first start. The following link : http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org
is a great starting point to become more educated about the issue.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Marijuana use=the cause of violence and ignorance of certain world issues?
In order to please Bill O'Reilly and his fans, Jesse Watters went to the Colorado Pot Convention to interview its attendees, which was shown on The O'Reilly Factor. But instead of showing viewers questions being asked that were relevant to this kind of meeting, such as why they were so passionate and grateful about marijuana becoming legal in that state that they're having a whole convention about it, the video there was mostly shown of some attendees not knowing the facts of a couple of world issues. The whole video made it seem as if this ignorance was only due to them being pot-smokers. Furthermore, the shootings near this location seemed to be contributed to the convention being about marijuana use.
As usual, The O'Reilly Factor was being biased in their conservative "values." Marijuana being illegal in all of the U.S. for almost a century, with the exception of Washington and Colorado the past few months, has given it a bad stigma towards those who do not have much experience or knowledge of it. Bill O'Reilly also seemed to confuse correlation with causation in what people smoke compared to what knowledge they have and how violent they are. I personally would reason some attendees not knowing the answers to the world news questions being asked to them being young adults, and as one myself I understand the disinterest in what's happening in the world that doesn't affect me, especially compared to those older. The shootings that were near the convention also could not be contributed to marijuana use necessarily because it was not as if everyone or even most were being violent there.
As usual, The O'Reilly Factor was being biased in their conservative "values." Marijuana being illegal in all of the U.S. for almost a century, with the exception of Washington and Colorado the past few months, has given it a bad stigma towards those who do not have much experience or knowledge of it. Bill O'Reilly also seemed to confuse correlation with causation in what people smoke compared to what knowledge they have and how violent they are. I personally would reason some attendees not knowing the answers to the world news questions being asked to them being young adults, and as one myself I understand the disinterest in what's happening in the world that doesn't affect me, especially compared to those older. The shootings that were near the convention also could not be contributed to marijuana use necessarily because it was not as if everyone or even most were being violent there.
Criticism is a Dangerous Slope to Slip in the Internet World
Criticism, of the constructive type, is normally a useful - even helpful and desirable tool for improvement. As I researched for this blog, I uncovered a dark snarky beast hiding in the folds of my mild-mannered Minnesota Hyde.
Our third blog exercise is about finding something on the Internet to criticize. I began my journey by demurely pondering a good site to criticize. With the detached objectivity of a researcher, I considered the easy prey. No, I wouldn't criticize Metro's website.
That's just too easy and I've done it before, I thought.
I turned to the news for something to criticize. Then the idea hit me. I felt the small electric charge zipping along my spine that ended with a sour feeling as I considered the name and whispered it to no one particular.
Ann Coulter.
My normal inclination when reading some news headline about the fierily conservative pundit is to shake my head in dismissal and quickly click to somewhere else. I know she's playing to her fan base. I know her rhetoric feeds the need for controversy that Those Who Inhabit that aisle along the ideological fringe desire. It isn't any different for the opposite aisle who often spew similar, yet dissimilar rhetoric.
I'm above all this, I think, sipping from my imaginary Latte with my pinky finger sticking out.
Does my hair suddenly seem just a little "wilder"? Or is it just my middle-aged imagination making up for hair loss? I google "Ann Coulter" and what I see makes me cringe.
"Ann Coulter: Bombing Suspect's Wife Should Be Jailed For Wearing Hijab"
Oh. Come. On... I think.
Surprised by the little frothy spittle on my lips, I quickly wipe it away with a napkin and sheepishly peer out of my cubicle at work.
Did I just make a grunting noise?
Alarmed at my own morbid curiosity, but helpless, I begin reading the article. Pulsing between fascination and horror, I can only get so far before I need to stop. I'm breathing a little too hard now. Are my eyes seeming a little white around the edges like a caged animal?
Blinking back the crazy, the student researcher in me re-emerges for a brief moment. I wonder about other articles and whether they might add some nice context to my blog post.
Ooh, ohh, yea. Like this one. And I'm off to the races again.
Before I know it, I'm flashing back to a headline I saw some time ago. I recall that Coulter suggested that the daughter of a prominent politician should be murdered.
Meghan McCain goes on Twitter rant against Ann Coulter
As I read on, Ann Coulter slowly returns to just a sideline irritation. My adrenaline begins to fade and the whites around my eyes return to normal. My cube looks worse for wear; wheel marks from my chair make crazy eights in the carpet and my coffee is all gone.
I straighten my shirt, comb my hair back with my fingers, and begin to write my blog exercise without recalling what just happened.
I'm above all this, I think.
Our third blog exercise is about finding something on the Internet to criticize. I began my journey by demurely pondering a good site to criticize. With the detached objectivity of a researcher, I considered the easy prey. No, I wouldn't criticize Metro's website.
That's just too easy and I've done it before, I thought.
I turned to the news for something to criticize. Then the idea hit me. I felt the small electric charge zipping along my spine that ended with a sour feeling as I considered the name and whispered it to no one particular.
Ann Coulter.
My normal inclination when reading some news headline about the fierily conservative pundit is to shake my head in dismissal and quickly click to somewhere else. I know she's playing to her fan base. I know her rhetoric feeds the need for controversy that Those Who Inhabit that aisle along the ideological fringe desire. It isn't any different for the opposite aisle who often spew similar, yet dissimilar rhetoric.
I'm above all this, I think, sipping from my imaginary Latte with my pinky finger sticking out.
Huffington Post |
"Ann Coulter: Bombing Suspect's Wife Should Be Jailed For Wearing Hijab"
Oh. Come. On... I think.
Surprised by the little frothy spittle on my lips, I quickly wipe it away with a napkin and sheepishly peer out of my cubicle at work.
Did I just make a grunting noise?
Alarmed at my own morbid curiosity, but helpless, I begin reading the article. Pulsing between fascination and horror, I can only get so far before I need to stop. I'm breathing a little too hard now. Are my eyes seeming a little white around the edges like a caged animal?
Blinking back the crazy, the student researcher in me re-emerges for a brief moment. I wonder about other articles and whether they might add some nice context to my blog post.
Ooh, ohh, yea. Like this one. And I'm off to the races again.
Meghan McCain goes on Twitter rant against Ann Coulter
As I read on, Ann Coulter slowly returns to just a sideline irritation. My adrenaline begins to fade and the whites around my eyes return to normal. My cube looks worse for wear; wheel marks from my chair make crazy eights in the carpet and my coffee is all gone.
I straighten my shirt, comb my hair back with my fingers, and begin to write my blog exercise without recalling what just happened.
I'm above all this, I think.
This is my blogging exercise 3
Is fishing done?
As a child growing up in Minnesota I remember summer
vacation from school as a time to get outdoors and enjoy the weather by
fishing. However these days when I am
out on the lake I notice less and less younger people out doing the same.
Minnesota is well known as the land of 10,000 lakes and
having wonderful lakes to catch small or large size fish. So what is the issue? Am I just fishing the
wrong lakes at the wrong time or is it true that the percent of youth fishing
in Minnesota is on the decline?
According to Minnesota
Public Radio the evidence is yes. In
the past 15 years there has been a decline in the amount of youth obtaining
fishing licenses and young adults aren’t fishing as often or taking their young
children fishing.
I know that a lot of people are too busy these days, have
too much to do, and have other things that don’t allow time for fishing, and
the excuses go on and on. I say it is
valuable family time that needs to be carried on as a tradition in Minnesota,
allows you to relieve stress, and is a wonderful time to bond with your
children.
With over 10,000 lakes we need to carry on this wonderful
gift we have been given and pass it to our kids. Leave the phone, IPod, and other electronics
at home and get out on the lakes with your children, relive part of your
childhood, and ensure it is part of your child’s childhood.
Think you're too young to have cancer?
The TL/DR sum-up:
You're not too young. Get checked.
The longer version:
A few years ago, my friend Jason threw a totally hilarious 33rd birthday party. Its theme was "Over the Top," a Sylvester Stallone arm-wrestling movie.
Everyone was encouraged to dress the part, with truck-driver hats, plaid shirts with the sleeves ripped off, aviator glasses worn inside...
I didn't go because I had something else to do. I can't for the life of me remember what it was. I remember thinking, "I'll go next year."
I called him soon after and asked about getting together to give him his birthday present. The day we were going to hang out, he let me know he was going in to the doctor - he thought he might have kidney stones.
Later that day, I got a text from him to the effect of "****, I have cancer."
Seven weeks after he was diagnosed, he had died of colon cancer.
He had not experienced previous symptoms. He was too young for cancer screening.
Jason was an incredibly vivacious person. He was a cartographer, a photographer, an avid traveller; he'd been planning a trip to Vietnam with friends.
But suddenly, there was no 'next year.'
I certainly learned a life lesson about prioritizing events and time with friends, but that conversation is for another day.
I also learned that cancer is NOT an old person's disease.
You probably know someone young who has been affected by this as well. One of my high school classmates discovered he had testicular cancer at only 19 years old. I recently found out that a young woman in my social circle - also only 19 years old - has stage 4 colon cancer. (The link goes to a break-down of cancer stages, but think 'Oh holy **** that's really bad.')
Why, then, are people encouraged to begin screening at age 50 if they are considered to be at 'average risk'?
I don't know.
As a woman, I was expected to begin annual Pap tests as a teenager. I had no family history of cervical cancer, I was not sexually active and so the chances of finding HPV were pretty darn small, and I was, what, 16 years old? Part of that annual exam includes the health care worker palpating my breasts to check for lumps.
I mention these things because I want to point out that societally, we already accept the importance of early screening for various medical concerns, including STDs/VDs (even if the patient is not yet sexually active [yes, I do understand that sexual contact is not the only way to transmit many of those diseases]). When will we begin to expect proper screening for colorectal cancer? What other cancers or auto-immune disfunctions should we, as patients, be demanding tests for?
If you have a change in your normal health, please, please, please don't ignore it. Go in and discuss it with a health care provider. If your health care provider doesn't listen, see a different provider. You are the client, and you deserve good care in return for your money.
There are many websites devoted to information about this. Here's a good one to start with.
Please spread the word. It might save someone's life.
You're not too young. Get checked.
The longer version:
A few years ago, my friend Jason threw a totally hilarious 33rd birthday party. Its theme was "Over the Top," a Sylvester Stallone arm-wrestling movie.
Everyone was encouraged to dress the part, with truck-driver hats, plaid shirts with the sleeves ripped off, aviator glasses worn inside...
I didn't go because I had something else to do. I can't for the life of me remember what it was. I remember thinking, "I'll go next year."
I called him soon after and asked about getting together to give him his birthday present. The day we were going to hang out, he let me know he was going in to the doctor - he thought he might have kidney stones.
Later that day, I got a text from him to the effect of "****, I have cancer."
Seven weeks after he was diagnosed, he had died of colon cancer.
He had not experienced previous symptoms. He was too young for cancer screening.
Jason was an incredibly vivacious person. He was a cartographer, a photographer, an avid traveller; he'd been planning a trip to Vietnam with friends.
But suddenly, there was no 'next year.'
I certainly learned a life lesson about prioritizing events and time with friends, but that conversation is for another day.
I also learned that cancer is NOT an old person's disease.
You probably know someone young who has been affected by this as well. One of my high school classmates discovered he had testicular cancer at only 19 years old. I recently found out that a young woman in my social circle - also only 19 years old - has stage 4 colon cancer. (The link goes to a break-down of cancer stages, but think 'Oh holy **** that's really bad.')
Why, then, are people encouraged to begin screening at age 50 if they are considered to be at 'average risk'?
I don't know.
As a woman, I was expected to begin annual Pap tests as a teenager. I had no family history of cervical cancer, I was not sexually active and so the chances of finding HPV were pretty darn small, and I was, what, 16 years old? Part of that annual exam includes the health care worker palpating my breasts to check for lumps.
I mention these things because I want to point out that societally, we already accept the importance of early screening for various medical concerns, including STDs/VDs (even if the patient is not yet sexually active [yes, I do understand that sexual contact is not the only way to transmit many of those diseases]). When will we begin to expect proper screening for colorectal cancer? What other cancers or auto-immune disfunctions should we, as patients, be demanding tests for?
If you have a change in your normal health, please, please, please don't ignore it. Go in and discuss it with a health care provider. If your health care provider doesn't listen, see a different provider. You are the client, and you deserve good care in return for your money.
There are many websites devoted to information about this. Here's a good one to start with.
Please spread the word. It might save someone's life.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Wonderful. Just Wonderful. Social Media Again Embarrasses Someone in Government - but 15 at Once?
I love this photo.
Guess the correct answer to this question:
Where are all the lawmakers at this important Senate hearing on long-term unemployment?
Senate Hearing on Long-Term Unemployment Last Thursday |
Guess the correct answer to this question:
Where are all the lawmakers at this important Senate hearing on long-term unemployment?
- Someone heard the Mr. Frosty ice cream truck outside.They'll be right back.
- Someone said they saw a gen-u-ine gold dollar coin under here somewhere. It's mine I think. Pardon while we all look.
- Nobody decided to show up.
If you chose the answer three, then - DING, DING, DING - you win!
Well, you almost win. To our credit, Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar was the only lawmaker who showed up on time. Granted she is the committee's vice-chair. While I really want to give her credit, the critical thinker in me wonders if she just pulled the short straw, or someone double-dared her.
It seems none of the other 18 highly paid senators - democrats and republicans alike - decided addressing long-term unemployment is important considering the wonderful state of our economy.
Niraj Chokshi's Tweet |
Not until Niraj Chokshi, a smart journalist reporting for the National Journal Reporter decided to tweet the above photo, did a few senators begin to trickle in. Eventually three other Senators arrived, probably scuffing their shoes on the expensive carpet we all paid for as they sullenly made their way to cushy leather armchairs. I wonder if the guys testifying felt relieved or insulted, "Helloooo. is anyone there?"
Social media, especially Twitter, once again proves its value at exposing what before would probably have gone unseen.
Check out the National Journal Reporter article.
Some of the Tweets about this are also interesting.
This is my blogging exercise 2
Great weapons ?
These days, people have not
only talked about the use of social media; how cool it is , how it has been helpful
for social, economical and cultural development
in many place. Most us have concluded that social media is the best weapons
that can save the world from undemocratic government , poverty and lack of communication among individuals
, groups and community. Therefore, many
of us think that this technology is pretty great for all people. Really? If you one who
think that way , don't' full yourself. This technology has used by many
organized groups and governments to invade people liberty; basic human right, freedom
of speech and privacy in all over the world .
Million if not billion people are not allow to use social media , or allowed
only partially in some country. Furthermore,
many people are not
fortunate for this technology. There are some arguments contrary to the above promise by saying that these matter have happened only in
autocratic, undemocratic, socialist countries. Is that true ? Here is what the New York times investigation have found:
By NICOLE PERLROTH
New York Tim
New York Tim
Ethiopian intelligence
uses FinSpy, a surveillance software, that grab images off computer screens,
record Skype chats, turn on cameras and microphones and keystrokes.By NICOLE
PERLROTH
New York TimesLast May, two security researchers volunteered to look at a few suspicious e-mails sent to some Bahraini activists. Almost one year later, the two have uncovered evidence that some 25 governments, many with questionable records on human rights, may be using off-the-shelf surveillance software to spy on their own citizens.
New York TimesLast May, two security researchers volunteered to look at a few suspicious e-mails sent to some Bahraini activists. Almost one year later, the two have uncovered evidence that some 25 governments, many with questionable records on human rights, may be using off-the-shelf surveillance software to spy on their own citizens.
Morgan Marquis-Boire, a
security researcher at Citizen Lab, at the University of Toronto’s Munk School
of Global Affairs, and Bill Marczak, a computer science doctoral student at the
University of California, Berkeley, found that the e-mails contained
surveillance software that could grab images off computer screens, record Skype
chats, turn on cameras and microphones and log keystrokes. The word “FinSpy”
appeared in the spyware code. FinSpy is spyware sold by the Gamma Group, a
British company that says it sells monitoring software to governments solely
for criminal investigations.
Now, one year later, Mr.
Marquis-Boire and Mr. Marczak have found evidence that FinSpy is being run off
servers in 25 countries, including Ethiopia and Serbia, without oversight.
Until Mr. Marquis-Boire
and Mr. Marczak stumbled upon FinSpy last May, security researchers had tried,
unsuccessfully, for a year to track it down. FinSpy gained notoriety in March
2011 after protesters raided Egypt’s state security headquarters and discovered
a document that appeared to be a proposal by the Gamma Group to sell FinSpy to
the government of President Hosni Mubarak .
Martin J. Muench, a Gamma
Group managing director, has said his company does not disclose its customers
but that Gamma Group sold its technology to governments only to monitor
criminals. He said that it was most frequently used “against pedophiles,
terrorists, organized crime, kidnapping and human trafficking.”
But evidence suggests the
software is being sold to governments where the potential for abuse is high.
“If you look at the list of countries that Gamma is selling to, many do not
have a robust rule of law,” Mr. Marquis-Boire said. “Rather than catching
kidnappers and drug dealers, it looks more likely that it is being used for
politically motivated surveillance.”
As of last year, Mr.
Marquis-Boire and Mr. Marczak, with other researchers at Rapid7, CrowdStrike
and others, had found command-and-control servers running the spyware in just
over a dozen countries. They have since scanned the entire Internet for FinSpy.
The Munk School is
publishing their updated findings on Wednesday. The list of countries with
servers running FinSpy is now Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Britain, Brunei,
Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Ethiopia, Germany, India, Indonesia,
Japan, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico, Mongolia, Netherlands, Qatar, Serbia,
Singapore, Turkmenistan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States and
Vietnam.
In Ethiopia, FinSpy was
disguised in e-mails that were specifically aimed at political dissidents. The
e-mails lured targets to click on pictures of members of Ginbot 7, an Ethiopian
opposition group. When they clicked on the pictures, FinSpy downloaded to their
machines and their computers began communicating with a local server in
Ethiopia.
“This continues the theme
of FinSpy deployments with strong indications of politically motivated
targeting,” the researchers wrote in their report.
A Turkmenistan server
running the software belonged to a range of I.P. addresses specifically
assigned to the ministry of communications. Turkmenistan is the first clear-cut
case of a government running the spyware off its own computer system. Human
Rights Watch has called Turkmenistan one of the world’s “most repressive
countries” and warned that dissidents faced “constant threat of government
reprisal.”
In Vietnam, the
researchers found evidence that FinSpy was running on Android-powered phones.
They found one Android phone infected with FinSpy that was sending text
messages back to a Vietnamese telephone number. That finding was particularly
troubling, researchers say, given recent clampdowns by the nation’s government.
Last year, Vietnam introduced censorship laws that prohibit bloggers from
speaking out against the country’s ruling Communist party. According to Human
Rights Watch, at least 40 people had since been convicted and sentenced to
prison terms. Many are now serving terms ranging from three to 13 years
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Taking Identity Theft to a New Level
On February 10, 2013, the British newspaper, The Guardian, ran a story on it's website with chilling implications for social media. The American defense contractor, Raytheon had recently developed - but not yet marketed - a new software program that can uncover where you have been, track where you are now, and predict - with some accuracy - where you will be in the near future.
Raytheon's software, known as Riot (Rapid Information Overlay Technology) exploits easily acquirable user data, such as GPS location, date, and time information found by trolling social media sites, which intelligent algorithms then use to deduce information about you.
Soon after the Guardian article, other established organizations, such as Zdnet, PCmag, The Telegraph (another British newspaper), and the ACLU offered their own take on Raytheon's Riot software. While their responses ranged from calling Riot "Google for Spies" (Guardian), "stalking software" (Telegraph), and "Business as Usual" (ZDnet) the ACLU noted, with some alarm, that "Riot could be used as a way to schedule a black-bag job to plant spyware on someone’s laptop".
Check out the articles for yourself.
This is my blogging exercise 1
Revolutionary Communication: 1968 Paris Uprising Posters
My first sighting of Shepard Fairey’s “Hope” poster was at Barbette in Minneapolis. I routinely peruse billboards and I don’t think I hesitated more than five seconds before I unpinned it from the cork board, rolled it up and gently tucked it under my arm. I knew I had a treasure (and besides, there was more than one). The bartender noticed and I had to do a little sweet talking, but I still have that poster, among others. Not all of the posters I’ve collected are political, but it seems that some of the best posters in history have been either musically or politically oriented.
"Return to Normal" |
It’s widely acknowledged that the political posters from the Paris Uprisings of 1968 greatly define the genre. I was first exposed to this period of French history through the steamy film The Dreamers, directed by Bernardo Bertolucci and set before and during the uprising. The posters shown briefly in the film piqued my interest more than the NC-17 content did, yet I could only find limited information, most of which was in French. Thanks to the Arab Spring and Occupy, the history of protest and protest art seem to have gained a lot of attention lately. There are all kinds of sources on the net and also a few beautiful new books dealing specifically with the poster art of this brief period.
"Be Young and Shut Up" |
"A Youth Disturbed Too Often by the Future" |
Although Occupy and these students share a common root (Situationist International), there is nothing vague about the poster messages of May 1968. They express anxiety for the future and distrust of authority and the press. They warn and inform of police brutality and call for for unity of the workforce and a better quality of life. They express that merely producing and consuming goods is not a good way to live and encouraged the viewer to believe that so much more was possible. They encouraged people to fight for change.
Atelier Populaire Mission Statement:
"The posters produced by the Atelier Populaire are weapons in the service of the struggle and are an inseparable part of it. Their rightful place is in the centers of conflict ... in the streets and on the walls of the factories. To use them for decorative purposes, to display them in bourgeois places of culture or to consider them as objects of aesthetic interest is to impair both their function and their effect."
Individual artists never took credit nor signed their work and long after these events had passed, the Popular Workshop refused to put any of the posters up for sale. I'm sure if these students had the media at the time, they would of been gods of Twitter and Facebook. Fortunately the media of the time left us a lasting and powerful record that is still relevant today. Despite the fact that the Popular Workshop would despise and discount me for a bourgeoisie, I would love to have just one of these posters prominently displayed in my collection. Ça, c'est dommage!
To view more posters check out Art for Change.
To buy a book, see Beauty Is in the Street: A Visual Record of the May '68 Paris Uprising
Location:
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)