Wednesday, April 24, 2013


Great weapons ?

        These days, people have not only talked about the use of social media; how cool it is , how it has been helpful for social, economical and cultural development  in many place. Most us have concluded that social media is the best weapons that can save the world from undemocratic government , poverty and lack of  communication  among  individuals , groups and  community. Therefore, many of us think that this technology is pretty great for all people. Really?  If you one who  think that way , don't' full yourself. This technology has used by many organized groups and governments to invade people liberty; basic human right, freedom of speech and privacy in all over the world .  Million if not billion people are not allow to use social media , or allowed only partially in some country.  Furthermore,  many  people are not  fortunate for this technology. There are some arguments  contrary to the above promise by saying  that  these matter have happened  only  in autocratic,  undemocratic, socialist  countries. Is that true ?  Here is what the  New York times  investigation have found:  
By NICOLE PERLROTH
New York Tim

 

 

 

Ethiopian intelligence uses FinSpy, a surveillance software, that grab images off computer screens, record Skype chats, turn on cameras and microphones and keystrokes.By NICOLE PERLROTH
New York TimesLast May, two security researchers volunteered to look at a few suspicious e-mails sent to some Bahraini activists. Almost one year later, the two have uncovered evidence that some 25 governments, many with questionable records on human rights, may be using off-the-shelf surveillance software to spy on their own citizens.

Morgan Marquis-Boire, a security researcher at Citizen Lab, at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs, and Bill Marczak, a computer science doctoral student at the University of California, Berkeley, found that the e-mails contained surveillance software that could grab images off computer screens, record Skype chats, turn on cameras and microphones and log keystrokes. The word “FinSpy” appeared in the spyware code. FinSpy is spyware sold by the Gamma Group, a British company that says it sells monitoring software to governments solely for criminal investigations.

Now, one year later, Mr. Marquis-Boire and Mr. Marczak have found evidence that FinSpy is being run off servers in 25 countries, including Ethiopia and Serbia, without oversight.

Until Mr. Marquis-Boire and Mr. Marczak stumbled upon FinSpy last May, security researchers had tried, unsuccessfully, for a year to track it down. FinSpy gained notoriety in March 2011 after protesters raided Egypt’s state security headquarters and discovered a document that appeared to be a proposal by the Gamma Group to sell FinSpy to the government of President Hosni Mubarak .

Martin J. Muench, a Gamma Group managing director, has said his company does not disclose its customers but that Gamma Group sold its technology to governments only to monitor criminals. He said that it was most frequently used “against pedophiles, terrorists, organized crime, kidnapping and human trafficking.”

But evidence suggests the software is being sold to governments where the potential for abuse is high. “If you look at the list of countries that Gamma is selling to, many do not have a robust rule of law,” Mr. Marquis-Boire said. “Rather than catching kidnappers and drug dealers, it looks more likely that it is being used for politically motivated surveillance.”

As of last year, Mr. Marquis-Boire and Mr. Marczak, with other researchers at Rapid7, CrowdStrike and others, had found command-and-control servers running the spyware in just over a dozen countries. They have since scanned the entire Internet for FinSpy.

The Munk School is publishing their updated findings on Wednesday. The list of countries with servers running FinSpy is now Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Britain, Brunei, Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Ethiopia, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico, Mongolia, Netherlands, Qatar, Serbia, Singapore, Turkmenistan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States and Vietnam.

In Ethiopia, FinSpy was disguised in e-mails that were specifically aimed at political dissidents. The e-mails lured targets to click on pictures of members of Ginbot 7, an Ethiopian opposition group. When they clicked on the pictures, FinSpy downloaded to their machines and their computers began communicating with a local server in Ethiopia.

“This continues the theme of FinSpy deployments with strong indications of politically motivated targeting,” the researchers wrote in their report.

A Turkmenistan server running the software belonged to a range of I.P. addresses specifically assigned to the ministry of communications. Turkmenistan is the first clear-cut case of a government running the spyware off its own computer system. Human Rights Watch has called Turkmenistan one of the world’s “most repressive countries” and warned that dissidents faced “constant threat of government reprisal.”
In Vietnam, the researchers found evidence that FinSpy was running on Android-powered phones. They found one Android phone infected with FinSpy that was sending text messages back to a Vietnamese telephone number. That finding was particularly troubling, researchers say, given recent clampdowns by the nation’s government. Last year, Vietnam introduced censorship laws that prohibit bloggers from speaking out against the country’s ruling Communist party. According to Human Rights Watch, at least 40 people had since been convicted and sentenced to prison terms. Many are now serving terms ranging from three to 13 years

2 comments:

  1. Having a product that could be used either positively or in an abusive, damaging or negative manner by a customer (uranium, for instance) is difficult to regulate once it is sold. One hopes that a sense of ethics would take precedent... but without any kind of regulation, how can ethics be enforced? How do we do this internationally across borders? The soul of business/capitalism is to be profitable- can you imagine how much this company made by selling their product to a country?

    Someone should kick FinSpy in the virtual shins. Now HERE's a concept for a class- what about choosing a company/product like this (operating in a seriously questionable manner in the world) and wreaking havoc with a social media campaign making consumers aware and encouraging action against this company? Sounds like FUN! But Dr. Andrew might get in trouble as a result of our academic hijinks... ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, I can handle it - if you want to take on a Yes Men approach to mischief making and disruption I'm all over it.

    ReplyDelete