I
think that our classroom (students and professor) provided a decent
representation of the public. There definitely seemed to be two obvious opposing sides
when discussions were on the topics of Freedom for Firearms and Simon
Mainwaring’s book. There were a few people who would be vocal about their
opposition or their support of the arguments and they would often carry the
discussion, although I’d say that the people who were not often vocal were the
majority, as it seems to be the case with the general public.
The most
interesting discussions (as far as opinions being vocalized) were the ones
about Simon Mainwaring’s We First concept. There were some who thought that his
ideas were brilliant and worth exploring, and there were some who thought his
ideas were unrealistic and focused on a utopia that could never come true.
Regardless of where you stand on Mainwaring’s book, he did bring up engaging
topics of conversation.
I
thought it would be cool to bring to your attention that Simon Mainwaring has
his own blog based on his We First theme. The blog provides an interesting read, and there is
even an article he wrote which discusses the Abercrombie & Fitch “Fitch the Homeless” campaign (you may remember the video we watched about it in class) among other similar consumer campaigns.
I agree,the discussions in the class were fun and entertaining.I loved to hear on how people think about the world and cooperation's. For me personally it was a great learning experience because I never really looked at cooperation's as Mainwaring did.
ReplyDelete